You are here: Home » Cards International » Issues » Cards International 2011 » CI 467-468 October 2011 » Opinion: is EMV really all good for the US?

Opinion: is EMV really all good for the US?

Photo of Cards International editor James RatcliffVisa’s commitment to moving forward on EMV in the US has been a long time coming. It has been tried and tested across the world, and the case for its implementation is undeniably strong.

But it is easy to over-estimate the impact. The reality is that card not present and online fraud are the biggest security threats out there at the moment, and are only set to become more problematic going forward.

The move to chip and PIN, Visa says, is essential to enable mobile payments to take off.

The hope is that by presenting banks and retailers with the threat of missing the mobile payments train, EMV will finally gain the support in has always lacked in the US.

The threat seems fundamentally flawed. It is not strictly true EMV is essential to the future development of mobile payments. It is clearly important in the development of NFC and contactless via mobile handsets, but plenty of mobile payments solutions are being developed that do not rely on secure chip technology at all. And a great many of those ideas are coming out of the US.

When we talk about mobile payments, NFC and contactless is a red herring. It is already starting to feel like retro-fitting – the reverse engineering of plastic cards to keep chip manufacturers in the game. The biggest inventive leaps in payments are by-passing card schemes, and even banks, not to mention those manufacturers.

With Visa making major investments in Fundamo and Monetise, and with increasing momentum behind P2P payments solutions in general, it could well be argued that banks could indeed be better off investing in the development of apps and mobile services to facilitate payments more conveniently, rather than upgrading all their infrastructure to meet EMV specification.

 

Card fraud still an issue

That said, we are probably getting a few years ahead of ourselves. Card technology will be around for quite some time to come, and it does not make sense for US banks to allow their country to become the world’s major card fraud hub. As such Visa’s determination should be welcomed. From a fraud perspective, it is a shame this did not happen a little earlier.

As it stands it is not really about pushing on into the brave new world of mobile payments, but about managing the global reputation of US retail banks. There is the mounting evidence of card fraud and there is the fact US citizens are facing increasing difficulties using their cards overseas.

But if mobile banking and payments continue on their current trajectory, US issuers and merchants could be better off thinking way outside the card scheme box and truly maximising the potential of the mobile platform.

Read our news analysis here.

James Ratcliff

james.ratcliff@vrlfinancialnews.com