You are here: Home » Private Banker International » Issues » PBI 2010 » PBI 256 January 2010 » Heading a private bank: an impossible job?

Heading a private bank: an impossible job?

The former head of BBVA’s private bank has become the latest executive to leave mainstream wealth management and claim the industry cannot reconcile core conflicts of interests between employees and clients. Will Cain spoke to Daniel de Fernando, now at the Spanish family office MdF Achievers.

 

Heading a wealth management business as part of a universal bank is an impossible job, according to the former head of BBVA’s private bank Daniel de Fernando.

De Fernando, who now heads the private investment office MdF Achievers in Spain, is the latest banker to leave the mainstream industry claiming the interests of clients and bankers are deeply misaligned.

“The private banking industry is built in such a way that when you run one of those businesses your main headache is how you try to build and reconcile your interest as an employee and the interests of the clients you have to advise,” he said.

“It becomes extremely difficult and stressful. At the time, you think you can do it, but I do not think it can actually be done. When you run the business, you devote a lot of energy to that and you have a permanent feeling of dissatisfaction.”

De Fernando’s views echoed those of other senior wealth management figures that have left larger banking groups to set up new businesses or moved to family offices. In May 2009, Shawn Mofidi, a high-profile Middle East banker at Citigroup, joined Geneva-based family office Global Wealth Management. He said that while banks talked about being “trusted advisers”, the reality was they were “conflicted; they talked about unconflicted advice, but the reality was it was biased”.

Other bankers have also voiced concerns, particularly over the sale of structured products. The high margins and revenues on the structures mean advisers under pressure to generate revenue are effectively incentivised to put clients into them, regardless of whether they are appropriate.

De Fernando left BBVA, where he was also head of asset management, a year ago to set up MdF Achievers. The new business received regulatory clearance last summer and has been operational for six months. It was formed by merging two family offices, MdF Family Partners and Achievers Family Office, both based in Madrid. Business so far has been in line with expectations, though he gave little specific detail on the number of families he was working with or the volume of client assets under advice. It works with clients with €20 million ($29 million) and above, though this varies considerably depending on the complexity of a client’s investment portfolio and family structure.

“We have found a marketplace that was not very favourable in terms of liquidity events, but very favourable in terms of the value proposition of non-conflicted advice,” he said. “So the overall effect has been neutral effectively. We are evolving very much as expected.”

In June last year, MdF established a partnership with UK private investment office Lord North Street which sees it receive investment services including asset allocation advice and manager selection capability. De Fernando sits on the investment committee of Lord North Street in return.

“I think it goes further than providing investment views or asset allocation” said de Fernando.

International co-operation

“It makes sense for a business like ours to have international cooperation with others. It gives you more scale, more critical mass in the market and means you have eyes and ears everywhere in the market place.”

The partners may extend their cooperation, through enhancing their asset allocation models and communicating further on market views and manager selection. He said the client portfolios of Lord North Street and MdF were converging towards each other meaning they could also benefit from reduced fees charged by managers because of the increased size of their clients’ assets.

“These affiliations among family offices make sense and I think we will see more of that in the market place,” said de Fernando.

Multi family offices are still largely domestic operations because much of their expertise is related to the domestic legal framework they operate in. They tend to be specialist service providers in one market place, but the global nature of their clients means there is a need for partnerships.

“That is why it makes sense for us to partner with someone in a different market, giving us a view from that market,” said de Fernando.

“A lot of people can provide you with that kind of service or help, but if you look at the foundation of our business, it is based on the lack of conflict of interests. So there is nothing better really than to partner with an organisation which shares that model because you know you are getting the best advice.”

Transparency of fees is traditionally another area that differentiates multi family offices from private banks. MdF charges a yearly fee, not dependent on asset allocation. Any retrocessions secured from product providers are paid directly to clients.

“We tend not to like performance fees,” de Fernando said. “We can see the commercial attractiveness, but they are a seed for conflict of interest. We like to say our performance is on a daily basis, because firing us is the easiest thing in the world. If a client is unhappy with what we do, they only have to send us one letter and we are out.”

MdF provides the types of services a private investment office typically offers in Europe – designing and implementing strategies for wealthy families, focusing on areas like manager selection, due diligence and asset allocation. It also offers family office and administrative services including family governance and advice, a model more traditionally found in the US than Europe. European family offices tend to focus more on investment management and advice than the wider range of family services.